<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maximum FireWire Cable Length</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.astronomycamerasblog.com/2007/09/26/maximum-firewire-cable-length/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.astronomycamerasblog.com/2007/09/26/maximum-firewire-cable-length/</link>
	<description>Official Blog to The Imaging Source Astronomy Cameras / Astrophotography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:58:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: profjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycamerasblog.com/2007/09/26/maximum-firewire-cable-length/comment-page-1/#comment-1305</link>
		<dc:creator>profjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycamerasblog.com/2007/09/26/maximum-firewire-cable-length/#comment-1305</guid>
		<description>Benjamin,
Until recently there was not a reason for The Imaging Source to manufacture such cameras as it is primarily a machine vision company where FireWire is the leading architecture. Since we have stepped out into various additional markets including astronomy and surveillance, we have been seriously considering ethernet, or GigE, camera development as a future endeavor.
Thanks for your interest,
profjohn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benjamin,<br />
Until recently there was not a reason for The Imaging Source to manufacture such cameras as it is primarily a machine vision company where FireWire is the leading architecture. Since we have stepped out into various additional markets including astronomy and surveillance, we have been seriously considering ethernet, or GigE, camera development as a future endeavor.<br />
Thanks for your interest,<br />
profjohn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Verdessi</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycamerasblog.com/2007/09/26/maximum-firewire-cable-length/comment-page-1/#comment-1292</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Verdessi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 10:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycamerasblog.com/2007/09/26/maximum-firewire-cable-length/#comment-1292</guid>
		<description>Hello,
I can not understand why to use an unsuitable interfase. What is the reason for to use a short-distance capable interfase, like USB or Firewire? 
Why not to use a cheap 100 Mb/s ethernet instead ? It is easy to use, very cheap, all the world knows it and all the PC have one o more ethernet interface. And without mention the WiFi.... 

I will be very thankful with your answer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
I can not understand why to use an unsuitable interfase. What is the reason for to use a short-distance capable interfase, like USB or Firewire?<br />
Why not to use a cheap 100 Mb/s ethernet instead ? It is easy to use, very cheap, all the world knows it and all the PC have one o more ethernet interface. And without mention the WiFi&#8230;. </p>
<p>I will be very thankful with your answer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
