<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dynamics Of Dynamic Range</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.astronomycamerasblog.com/2007/11/05/the-dynamics-of-dynamic-range/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.astronomycamerasblog.com/2007/11/05/the-dynamics-of-dynamic-range/</link>
	<description>Official Blog to The Imaging Source Astronomy Cameras</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carl Novosel</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycamerasblog.com/2007/11/05/the-dynamics-of-dynamic-range/#comment-2698</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Novosel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 06:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycamerasblog.com/2007/11/05/the-dynamics-of-dynamic-range/#comment-2698</guid>
		<description>It was good to clarify inaccuracies in Sean's article but Sean didn't deserve the Spinal Tap analogy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was good to clarify inaccuracies in Sean&#8217;s article but Sean didn&#8217;t deserve the Spinal Tap analogy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
