Blogged by profjohn in Reviews, Sample Images on November 16, 2007 at 16:27 CET.
Profjohn, I have been working with John Kirchhoff, Manager of Riders Hobby Shop in Livonia, Michigan. [...] I must say that I am extremely pleased with my purchase of the Firewire version, DMK 21AF04.AS The results that I have obtained are far greater than I had anticipated.

I have captured and retained over 300gb of image data that continues to amaze me with its dynamic range and resolution. I am confident that images obtained with my C11 @ f/25 through a Baader IR Pass filter are reaching Dawes Limit (0.41 arc seconds).
Keep up the good work!
Thanks
Jim Frisbie
Permalink
Blogged by profjohn in Reviews, Sample Images, Software for Mac OS on November 14, 2007 at 17:29 CET.
For those of you wondering how well The Imaging Source cameras work on Mac computers, here is quite a nice review of the first peak at Mars from Dave, with his new DBK 21AF04.AS in the UK.

It was only the second time I’d used the camera, the first time I’ve imaged Mars and the first time I’ve ever seen Mars through a telescope.
The camera, with Astro IIDC software on my Mac was a joy to use.
Regards
Dave
You can see more shots and comment on Dave’s first images in his blog.
Permalink
Blogged by Jonathan Maron in Reviews on November 9, 2007 at 13:13 CET.
Marnix Praet has send us the following review of one of our USB astronomy cameras. As Marnix’s primary language is not English, I have taken the liberty of correcting some of his text. The corrections took place at a linguistic level and not a content level. The review has also been slightly shortened into a blog-sized post.
Marnix writes:
First Impression Of New DMK USB 2.0 Camera
I am very pleased with the concept of a USB DMK camera. I have tested it on the almost full moon at rates between 15 and 60 fps and I have not lost one single frame - fantastic!
The software works fine by me. No complains about that.
The camera offers some good features: a nice histogram settings panel, while you are taking AVI’s. The noise reduction - a super feature for bad seeing conditions - great!
One small point: If you use noise reduction, you may see a raster on your image after processing with RegiStax.
The software is great. It works fine, without freezing and I have no bugs found for now.
The chip is a little on the small size, but its sensitivity is enormous.
I have taken some shots of the moon with my Meade apo and have tried out different filters, such as IR PRO, IR blocking, H-alpha.
This USB camera is a breakthrough for astrophotographers, who wish to capture the Moon and planets. It was a great experience and a pleasure to work with such a good camera (USB 2.0) and great software.
And a fantastic first night out.
Marnix Praet
Permalink
Blogged by Jonathan Maron in Reviews on November 7, 2007 at 08:02 CET.
Following our recent blog post on powering astronomy cameras in the field, Oldfield So of Hong Kong has written down his experiences on cabling and mobile power supplies.

Oldfield writes:
DMK camera uses standard 6-pin 1394 power to connect to the computer, these type of cable will also carry 12V DC for the DMK. However, some notebook PC, despite having 6-pin ports, might not deliver power if they’re in battery mode. Therefore, you will need something else to provide power for the DMK.
Read the rest of his blog post for the full story.
Permalink
Blogged by profjohn in Community, Reviews, Sample Images on October 19, 2007 at 00:06 CET.
Dan Kaplan, an astronomy customer in Kensington, Maryland and an avid DMK user since January of this year, has produced numerous images with the mono, the color and the raw Bayer cameras available on AstronomyCameras.com. Dan sent a couple of Saturn shots to me a few days ago that I thought all would enjoy.
Additionally, he has great things to say about our cameras!
Although I’ve had a DMK camera (and the DBK 31 AF03.AS) for just a few months, I’ve been involved with planetary imaging for several years. I’ve been primarily using a ToUcam Pro webcam and have been impressed with the results, but decided to step up to a better camera to try to eek out a bit of additional detail. Simply put, I was amazed at the results I could achieve with the DMK camera. It’s really in a different league from other cameras I’ve tried. Since getting the camera, my skies have been consistently mediocre, with very few nights of even fairly steady seeing, and the transparency has been, well, lousy. So, I haven’t been using the DMK under ideal conditions, but, even so, I’ve gotten images much better than anything I could do in the past. Not only with the ToUcam, but other cameras as well, some costing a good deal more than the DMK.
I have attached three images. The first one, of Saturn, taken with a 7″ TMB apochromatic refractor, has the most detail of any Saturn image I’ve taken.

The second picture of Saturn is taken with a 3.5″ Questar. The Questar has really sharp optics, but it’s still a 3.5″ scope. Although conventional wisdom says that you’re just not going to get much detail, to my surprise, the Saturn image is the sharpest one I’ve seen yet using the 3.5 and looks much like images using the Questar 7.

And the moon picture…just as impressive.
Dan Kaplan, Kensington, MD
Permalink